10 Controversial Vintage Ads That Wouldn’t Be Allowed Today




Nowadays, adverts are quite well thought out and brands are extremely careful when choosing what their ads contain. It doesn’t matter whether it’s a printed ad, a TV ad, an online ad or even a radio ad, you can be sure that there’s been many meetings in which every single aspect of the ad was scrutinised and analysed in order to get to a stage where it was deemed appropriate for its target audience.

A few decades ago however, it seems that this wasn’t the case. Well, it probably was the case but because things were less strict in terms of advertising, a lot more controversial ideas slipped through the net than they do today. In fact, there’s been quite a few controversial ads over the years and although they almost certainly wouldn’t be allowed today, they give a good representation as to how advertising has changed over the years.

So, here are some of the most controversial vintage ads that were actually used to advertise products. Enjoy.

#1 – Coca Cola

controversial vintage ads

Source: TheGlamorousHousewife.com

Today, Coca Cola is a worldwide brand, and each day, millions of people consume the sugary beverage. However, just because we consume it doesn’t mean that we know it to be healthy; in fact, Coca Cola is known to be an extremely unhealthy soft drink that can not only spike blood sugar levels but also, rot teeth and have a number of other negative effects.

So, obviously, you wouldn’t find Coca Cola advertising their product as healthy, would you?

Well, as you can see from the ad above, this is exactly what Coca Cola once did. The ad talks about how you should give your newborn baby Coca Cola to give him/her a better start in life. It even goes into detail about how it’s been proven that babies who start drinking soda will fit in better during their teen years.

It also says that Coca Cola promotes a healthy lifestyle, boosts personality and gives the body essential sugars!

#2 – Lucky Strikes

controversial vintage ads

Source: MarvelousFacts

Made famous by the hit TV show Mad Men, this ad for Lucky Strikes definitely wouldn’t be allowed today. As you’ll probably already know, advertisements for cigarettes are getting stricter all the time and in a lot of countries, advertisements are no longer allowed at all.

However, this hasn’t always been the case as you can see from the ad above. The ad actually uses a picture of Santa Claus to help market cigarettes as a great Christmas gift. It’s not often that you see Santa Claus enjoying a smoke but this was one occasion where this was the reality and clearly, it wouldn’t be allowed today.

It’s likely that this ad was made to appeal to not only adults, but also children/young adults too.

#3 – Sega

controversial vintage ads

Source: ZippyGamer

Nowadays, Sega has fallen behind somewhat in the computer gaming world as Sony and Microsoft have taken over. Back in the day however, Sega were a huge company and were actively advertising their latest products; and in a pretty controversial way too.

This ad for their latest games console was one of many, rather provocative ads driven by sexual puns and euphemisms. The ad runs the strapline “The More You Play With It, The Harder It Gets”. Yes, although technically it’s referring to the games console depicted in the image, it’s clear what the ad is really talking about.

I guess when things were in black and white, you had to be a little more creative.

#4 – Kelloggs

controversial vintage ads

Source: Oddee.com

Today, Kelloggs are known for making a number of family cereals, vitamin bars and therefore, their ads tend to be pretty straightforward and classy. However, this wasn’t the case back in the day as you can see from this hugely sexist ad from the company.

The ad promotes a 1950′s style relationship in which the woman would tend to stay at home and take care of the housework while the man would go out to work. It runs the strapline “The Harder A Wife Works, The Cuter She Looks”.

Again, this wouldn’t be allowed today in any shape or form and the worst part about the ad is that it promotes a Kelloggs product as the reason she loves to do the housework so much. “Vitamins darling, I always get my vitamins” – she proclaims.

So, if you want to enjoy housework, perhaps you should invest in Kelloggs PEP?

#5 – Cocaine Toothache Drops

controversial vintage ads

Source: DailyMail.co.uk

Cocaine is classed as one of the worst drugs available these days but it seems that a few decades ago, it was perfectly fine to use cocaine in toothache drops.

This ad for cocaine toothache drops from Lloyd Manufacturing Co. depicts the product as an instant cure for toothache; something that definitely wouldn’t be possible today.

Not only this, but the ad also (for some reason) features children; they’ve more than likely been cured by the Class-A drug product and left to get on with their day.

#6 – Alcoa Hytop

controversial vintage ads

Source: DailyMail.co.uk

Here’s an extremely sexist ad from the guys at Alcoa Aluminium. This ad was created to show just how easy it is to open one of the new Hytop’s which were added to tomato sauce bottles and many other household condiments. However, it’s the sexist way in which the ad chooses to depict this “ease” that’s so shocking.

Clearly, you can see from the tagline of the ad that it’s a rather sexist attempt at advertising. The ad reads “You mean a woman can open it?” along with an image of what appears to be a 1950′s housewife who seems to be shocked at how easy it is.

Basically, the ad is saying that it’s so easy to open, even a woman could do it. It’s extremely sexist and certainly wouldn’t be allowed by today’s advertising standards.

#7 – Chase And Sanborn

controversial vintage ads

Source: BuzzFeed

Here’s yet another hugely sexist ad from the 1950′s. This ad was created by the coffee manufacturer and retailer; Chase and Sanborn in 1952 and as you can clearly see from the ad itself, a husband appears to be spanking his wife; but why is this?

Well, if you take a quick look at the ad copy, everything will become apparent. Basically, it appears as though the man’s wife hasn’t been checking that the coffee she’s been buying has been packed for extra freshness and as you can see, this hasn’t gone down too well and therefore, his wife has earned herself a spanking. Essentially, the ad promotes a unique selling point of the Chase and Sanborn coffee but clearly, in the most sexist way possible.

Much like the previous ad, this advert just goes to show how far we’ve come in around 60 years in terms of advertising. There’s no way that sexist ads like this one would be allowed today and quite rightly so too, although it probably does still pay to check for freshness before you buy, whether you’re male or female.

#8 – Chesterfields

controversial vintage ads

Source: CargoCollective

Another area of advertising that has come a long way in recent years is that of tobacco advertising. These days, tobacco advertising is not allowed in the UK and many of the other western countries, but this hasn’t always been the case.

Around 50 years ago, tobacco advertising was perfectly legal and if you’ve ever watched the hit US show; Man Men, you’ve probably already seen a few of the tobacco related adverts that were created in this time period.

This advert for the tobacco brand Chesterfield’s is perhaps one of the worst as it actually uses a political figure (Ronald Reagon) to promote the brand. You can clearly see that in the ad, Ronald (at that time the President of the United States) appears to be wishing all of his smoker friends a Merry Christmas by giving them a pack of Chesterfield’s to celebrate the occasion.

You can see in the ad that Ronald appears to be a smoker of Chesterfield’s himself and is telling the world about how they have no unpleasant aftertaste like many other cigarette brands.

I’m certainly glad the days of tobacco advertising are over.

#9 – Chesterfields (another one!)

controversial vintage ads

Source: CargoCollective

To show just how out of hand tobacco advertising got in its heyday, I wanted to included yet another advert from the tobacco brand; Chesterfields on this list. If you thought the ad above was bad enough when it used a political and well-respected figure to advocate the use of cigarettes, you can see that this ad goes a step further by using a child in the advertising campaign.

This ad promotes Chesterfield cigarettes as the perfect birthday gift for fathers and it uses a child to do this. In the ad, you can see that the child and his mother have bought the child’s father a pack of Chesterfield’s for his birthday for three reasons; they’re milder, they’re better tasting and they’re cooler.

So, this ad not only depicts a child to promote smoking but also talks about how their brand of cigarettes are both cooler and better tasting. It’s certainly something that we wouldn’t get away with today and truthfully, we shouldn’t have gotten away with it all those years ago either.

#10 – Kenwood Chef

controversial vintage ads

Source: DailyMail.co.uk

The final advert that I wanted to feature on this list is yet another hugely sexist ad, this time from the likes of Kenwood; a brand of kitchen appliances that is still trading today.

In particular, this ad is promoting a new appliance from Kenwood named the Kenwood Chef. Clearly, it’s an electric mixer type device that many of us likely have in our own homes today. However, when it was introduced by Kenwood, this was a revolutionary device that had the power to do a whole host of tasks automatically that would have only been able to be done by hand previously.

So how do you market a device that makes cooking easier? Well, you compare it to your wife of course. The ad runs the copy “The Chef does everything but cook, that’s what wives are for”. It’s a hugely offensive ad that is once again extremely offensive to women as it makes out that wives are only good for one thing; cooking.

The ad features a cheesy looking married couple too; the kind of image that you likely would only see on a poor shopping channel in this day and age.

Conclusion

You might think ads are pretty controversial these days and yes, a lot of adverts are a lot more sexual than the ads of the past but to be honest, I find a lot of the ads mentioned in this post more offensive as quite simply, a lot of them depict extremely harmful products in extremely enticing ways (such as the Lucky Strikes ad for example).

So, although online advertising might still not be so highly regulated, I personally feel that the regulations in place for TV, radio and print ads are for the best. One thing we don’t want is to be sold cigarettes and other harmful products (such as cocaine toothache drops) thanks to inventive advertising campaigns.

This article was written by Josh, who is an advertising enthusiast with a particular interest in advertising over the years. He now works for the UK printing company DBP on the creative marketing aspect of the business.





Comments:

Scroll back to the top