SpyreStudios

Web Design and Development Magazine

  • Design
  • Showcase
  • Inspirational
  • Tutorials
  • CSS
  • Resources
  • Tools
  • UX
  • More
    • Mobile
    • Usability
    • HTML5
    • Business
    • Freebies
    • Giveaway
    • About SpyreStudios
    • Advertise On SpyreStudios
    • Get In Touch With Us

Designing Websites Around Colorblind Users

June 10, 2019 by Alex Fox

Colorblind users are more common than you might realize. It’s not hard to design your website to make it easy for colorblind visitors to use. In fact, it will often make your designs more effective for all users, not just those with atypical sight conditions. Learn how to design your website around colorblind users to ensure that all visitors can easily and effectively experience your designs.

Type of Color Blindness

Source: Coblis

First, it’s crucial to understand that color blindness is not a monolithic disorder. The condition involves mutations of malformations of the biological machinery our eyes use to detect colors: the rods and cones at the back of our retina that detect the photopigments that make up the color spectrum. If those rods and cones either do not for or form improperly, color vision will be abnormal or reduced.

The National Health Institute Survey reports that 1.3% of people in the United States have color blindness. Inherited color blindness is carried on the X chromosome, so it’s more likely in males. Genetic males only carry one copy of the X chromosome, whereas genetic females carry two X chromosomes. To simplify broadly, women are less-frequently afflicted by genetic disorders carried on the X chromosomes, as they have a “backup” copy of the genes they can use in place of a mutated chromosomal site.

The three types of visual cones (green, red and blue) connect to three primary varieties of colorblindness: deuter- (green), prot- (red), and trit- (blue). Cones can be absent (-anopia) or weak (-anomaly), leading to the spectrum of color sensing anomalies described below.

Red-Green Color Blindness (deuteranopia & protanopia)

Red-green color blindness is the most common form, affecting up to 8% of males and 0.5% of females of Northern European descent. It comes in a few different forms, but includes the abnormal detection of red, green, or both.

The most common form of this condition is deuteranomaly, affecting 6% of males and resulting in reduced detection of green. Red vision is unaffected. The opposite is protanomaly (1% of males), in which green vision is unaffected by red vision is weaker.

More rare are those whose eyes lack red or green cones completely. Those with protanopia (1% of males) cannot detect red at all, while those with deuteranopia (1% of males) cannot detect green at all.

Blue-Yellow Color Blindness

Blue-yellow color blindness is much rarer than red-green, affecting less than 1% of people. It comes in two forms. Those with tritanopia (1% of males) cannot see short-wavelength colors like blue, indigo, violet, and dark green. Those with tritanomaly (0.01% of males) perceive short-wavelength colors as shifted towards green.

Achromatopsia

Achromatopsia is complete color blindness, and the rarest form of the disorder, affecting 1 in 30,000 (0.0033%) of live births. Those with this disorder cannot sense color at all, instead only seeing lightness and darkness.

Designing for Colorblind Users

People with mild to moderate color blindness (which constitutes most people with atypical color perception) are not aware they have the disorder until they’re tested by a doctor. Because our brains simply accept our sensory input without question, there’s no part of the neurological process that gives the color blind a hint about their disorder.

As a result, the visitors that arrive at your website might not even know they perceive color differently, and wouldn’t know to ask for or enable accommodations. As such, the best accommodations are those that are seamlessly folded into your website.

As with all accessibility issues, adapting to users with color blindness is not an on or off situation. Instead, you can subtly adjust your designs to accommodate users with disabilities, all without dramatically altering the content or appearance. Just choosing colors smartly will often be enough.

Selecting Appropriate Color Palettes

As may be obvious from the descriptions above, certain colors are more relevant than others to colorblind users. While red and green are a great pair of opposite colors for typically-sighted users, they’re not so easy to use for those with red-green colorblindness.

Avoid using red/green contrast without additional backup in terms of shape, position, and labels. Considering the blue and yellow color blindness is less common, you might consider avoiding red and green as key user interface colors entirely.

Combine Color with Shape and Position

The best example of an adaptive design for colorblind users is the standards traffic light. While this uses red, green, and yellow, which are not colorblind-friendly colors, the color of the light is not the sole indicator of information. The position of the lights is also enforced by design, so even completely colorblind users can tell whether they should stop, go, or slow.

Seek to follow the traffic light example in your own work. With careful application, you’ll find that even typically-sighted users benefit. When information is conveyed through multiple dimensions simultaneously, such as through color and position, all users can absorb and process information more rapidly.

Don’t Use Color in Isolation

In general, avoid using color coding or color contrast alone to convey information. Either combine color with shape or position to make its purpose clear.

Take, for example, the red “X” on Windows systems. This X is typically red, but not always. Even so, the user doesn’t need to worry about the color. Even it’s common name, “the x button”, doesn’t convey its color. The label that appears on the button, the X, is more important for conveying information. While color allows for quick acquisition by typically-sighted users, the X allows for a second dimension of conveying information.

Test in Monochrome

Preview your designs in monochrome. While this doesn’t faithfully convey the experience of a colorblind user, it does provide useful insight into how effectively non-color aspects of your design convey information. In a broadly accessible design, users will be able to effective interact even with all color removed.

Outline Selections

For many web applications, selected items are indicated by a specific color. Of course, for colorblind users, such a design choice might make the application unusable. You don’t need to eliminate the colors. Instead, you should outline selected or active objects with a reasonably thick, dark outline. For example, a 2 pixel black border on the selected item is enough to indicate its status to colorblind users, and it aids typically-sighted users as well.

You might also like the following posts:

Effective Examples of Useful Slide Out Panels and Sidebars

Adding Customization Options to Your User Interface

4 Examples of Bad UI and How to Avoid Them

Filed Under: Accessibility, Design Tagged With: color, color blindness, colorblind, colorblind users, Design

Recent Posts

  • 31 Fresh Design Elements for Spring and Easter
  • 10 Templates for Music Concert Flyers
  • How to Build a Web Scraper Using Node.js
  • Best PHP Books, Courses and Tutorials in 2022
  • How to Get Your First Web Design Client

Archives

  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008

Categories

  • Accessibility
  • Android
  • Apps
  • Art
  • Article
  • Blogging
  • Books
  • Bootstrap
  • Business
  • CSS
  • Design
  • Development
  • Ecommerce
  • Fireworks
  • Flash
  • Freebies
  • Freelance
  • General
  • Giveaway
  • Graphic Design
  • HTML5
  • Icons
  • Illustrator
  • InDesign
  • Infographics
  • Inspirational
  • Interview
  • Jobs
  • jQuery
  • Learning
  • Logos
  • Matrix
  • Minimalism
  • Mobile
  • Motion Graphics
  • Music
  • News
  • Photoshop
  • PHP
  • Promoted
  • Rails
  • Resources
  • Showcase
  • Tools
  • Tutorial
  • Twitter
  • Typography
  • Uncategorized
  • Usability
  • UX
  • Wallpapers
  • Wireframing
  • WordPress
  • Work

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

SpyreStudios © 2022